My Internship At Franciscan St. Margaret Health Hospital

My Internship was at Franciscan St. Margaret Health, 5454 Hohman Avenue, Hammond, Indiana 46320-1999. The program and agency I was involved in was Indiana Volunteer Advocates for Seniors and Incapacitated Adults Program, also called VASIA which was founded by Franciscan St. Margaret Health Hospital of Hammond. They are in partnership with the Lake Superior Court as a best practices volunteer limited guardian model for collaborative problem-solving between the hospital healthcare providers and the courts and this is the purpose of the agency. The Agency Mission Statement is The Volunteer Advocates for Seniors and Incapacitated Adults Program provides quality volunteer limited guardian services to protect the health, well-being and safety of unbefriended, decisionally-incapable adults, who are ill and at-risk in hospitals, long-term are at-risk in hospitals, long-term care and hospice healthcare facilities in Northwest Indiana. And the Agency Mission is to develop a model volunteer adv ocacy program to serve the needs of incapacitated elderly persons who are alone and in hospital, nursing home or hospice health care facilities in the Northwest Indiana Region. The program goals are: †¢ To protect and improve the health, well-being and safety of ill and at-risk incapacitated adults in Northwest Indiana. †¢ To facilitate appropriate access to health care, social services for ill and at-risk incapacitated adults in Northwest Indiana. †¢ To expand a best practice volunteer limited

The Homeland Security Act Of 2002 - 1562 Words

The Homeland security act of 2002, was a major reconstruction of civil services in the United States of America, which had not happened since the passing of the Civil Service Reform act of 1978 (Brook King, 2007). Over the period of 24 years, minor modifications of civil service reform were established. The events that took place during the September 11 terrorist attacks would once more restructure the United States civil services. George H W Bush proclaimed in his state of the union address, on January 29, 2002, â€Å"Our first priority must always be the security of our nation† (American Rhetoric Online Speech Bank, 2002, para. 28). In addition, Bush stated later in his speech, â€Å"America is no longer protected by vast oceans. We are†¦show more content†¦The Acts effective date was set 60 days after the date of enactment, which established the DHS in early 2003 (H.R. Res. 5005, 2002). The newly established Department primary mission is to prevent terrori st attacks, reduce the vulnerability of the United States, and minimize damages caused by terrorist attacks (H.R. Res. 5005, 2002). Accomplishment of the mission was through coalescing 22 federal agencies together, under the management of one department. An established chain of command leaves the Secretary of the DHS, overall in charge of the whole department. The secretary of the DHS, Appointed by the President, is the head of the department. The president appoints the secretary with the consent of the senate (H.R. Res. 5005, 2002). After the appointment of the secretary, the secretary takes complete control of the department. The secretary delegates the functions of the department established by the act. In addition, can enter into agreements with other executive agencies and ensure the systems and databases are compatible with the other entities of the department (H.R. Res. 5005, 2002). The secretary also has the authority to make contracts, grants, and cooperation agreements between other federal and non-federal agencies to combat terrorism (H.R. Res. 5005, 2002). The secretary has the responsibility to access, and advocate, the resources need by state and local governments that is to implement the

Blue shark Free Essays

Dear George Brady, Hello, my name is Patricia Dwell, I am 14 years old and I got to the Cole Leila North School. My class read the book â€Å"Henna’s suitcase† and we learned information’s about the holocaust. The â€Å"Henna’s suitcase† book taught me a lot, it taught me to appreciate what and who I have in my life. We will write a custom essay sample on Blue shark or any similar topic only for you Order Now You have inspired me because you stayed strong through everything you had to go through during the holocaust. Whilst we were reading the book, I couldn’t imagine what you and Hanna had to go through. I couldn’t imagine having such a happy life with my family then next thing you know you’re separated from you parents and sibling. First of all I am really sorry for your loss, losing your parents, grandma, and your sister in such a young age must have been really hard to go through. I could never imagine going through what all the Jews did. You’re a really good person to look up to because you didn’t give up on life, some people did give up and most survivors from the holocaust don’t ever want to talk about what they went through. So I think that you are brave for deciding to move on life and also for telling yours and Henna’s story. I think that it is very special how you are able to tell children about your story and each them to not Judge people for being different. You inspired me to never give up and Just stay strong Just like how you stayed strong through the holocaust and how you never gave up on finding information about your sister Hanna. What you went through was horrible and I hope no one else would ever have to go through what you did. Through separating from your parents and sister, the box cars, having to wear a Jude star etc. You stayed strong and you decided to keep living life really Inspired me. Learning about the Holocaust taught me to never Judge anybody by what they believe In and who they are. What happened during the Holocaust Is so horrible; I honestly can’t believe people would treat Jews differently Just because they were different, and because they believed In different things. If everyone learned about the Holocaust, world war will hopefully never happen again. From what Vive learned I will for sure never Judge anyone for being different. Blue shark By g-annoyed decided to keep living life really inspired me. Believe in and who they are. What happened during the Holocaust is so horrible; I different, and because they believed in different things. If everyone learned about How to cite Blue shark, Papers

Critical Analysis of Allan Amanyire Statement System

Queston: Discuss about the Critical Analysis of Allan Amanyire Statement System. Answer: Introduction Dicey gave the principle of rule of law, which consisted of two elements, namely, supremacy of law so as to restrict arbitrary use of power and equal subjection of law towards all the classes of people living in the society. The principle of rule of law is integral for to achieve objectives of a democratic society (AM, 2012). Further, it acts as a basis for all other laws which are formed in the State. Thus, no laws can be made that are against the very principle of rule of law and equality before law shall be upheld. This paper analyzes the relationship of rule of law and democracy and its implementation in the context of Australian legal system. Further, it seeks to identify the impact of such fundamental principles on business corporations in Australia. Relationship between democracy and rule of law In an attempt to define the relationship between democracy and rule of law, it is pertinent to interpret, understand and analyze the meaning of these two terms rule of law and democracy. In simple words, rule of law means that law is over and above everything, including the government and other authorities. Rule of law imposes limits on power on authorities so that they cannot go beyond the law while performing their duties. Whereas democracy means such a system of government where people have equal rights to speak, vote and enjoy other benefits guaranteed by the State. (IDEA, 2015) Democracy and rule of law are sides of the same coin. They are integrated together and thus one cannot be defined without the aid of another. Democracy is a system of government, which has various key elements one of which is rule of law. Rule of law is an essential feature of a democratic government. Further, it can be said that democracy and rule of law are mutually reinforcing and convergent processes. It is well recognized that whenever democracy is to be build, it is necessary that there exists a broad and end-based terms definition of rule of law rather stating rule of law in mere procedural terms. Both rule of law and democracy are purely institutional approaches, which have no say in regards to the actual outcome. The relationship between the two strengthens when rule of law is linked with various substantive matters including justice (Raban, 2015). Democracy refers to protection of civil rights, which can be done only through robust implementation and integration of the principle of rule of law. In a democratic government, it is mandatory that political power is held through representative elections, which are conducted regularly in a fair manner. This principle of democracy can be linked to rule of law since it mandates the political power to work on applicable rules wherein announcements be made in advance and impartiality and uniformity is followed. In terms of good governance, rule of law and democracy are inseparable systems, which are required to be followed simultaneously. The concepts of democracy and rule of law are regularly co-related and joined by politicians, academicians, UN declarations and political commentators(Timothy Garton Ash, 2006). Thus, it is clear that democracy and rule of law are interrelated concepts in regards to functioning of government (Maravall Przeworski, 2003). There is high reliance of democracy on rule of law to ensure that its integral functions are imparted. A democratic government integrated rule of law by embodying it in its Constitution or other supreme laws. Further, rule of law is required to be followed by the authorities and government at all the levels so that democratic functioning of government is guaranteed. Critical analysis of democracy and rule of laws relationship to the Australian legal system The democratic government of Australia has based its functioning on the principle of rule of law. The Constitution of Australia embodies the rule of law (Blackshield Williams, 1998). The powers of parliament and government are restricted and thereby protection against arbitrary use of power is guaranteed to the citizens. In the judicial system of Australia, judges ensure a balance between powers of government, community rights and freedoms and law enforcement agencies while interpreting the rule of law(MOADOPH, 2016). The government of Australia is the government that is under the Constitution. Further, Constitution is an instrument of law framed on the basis of various traditional conceptions followed within the community and some of which are merely assumed to exist. Amongst such traditional conceptions, rule of law is also considered to be an assumption. Thus, one of the integral parts of the Constitution of Australia is rule of law. The main effect of rule of law is to restrict arbitrary use of power of the executives and other government authorities (Australain Communist Party v. The Commonwealth, 1951). The principle of rule of law ensures that the powers of the government are limited. The government must take such decisions which are lawful and thus must not act beyond the powers given to it under law. If a decision of the government is unlawful, then it can be challenged before the court to declare it to be void. This helps in providing higher level of protection in regards to freedom of society. This aspect of freedom comes from the democratic state, which Australia follows (Kinley, 1994). In A v. Hyden [(1984) 156 CLR 532], the court sought to protect the society from arbitrary and illegitimate actions of the state by enforcing the rule of law in a democratic federal government of Australia. In this case, the second element of Diceys rule of law was focused, i.e. equality of law for all the subjects in the State. In the context of Australian legal system, whose government is democratic and federal, rule of law has been implemented within the Constitution, due to which the powers of government are restricted and more scope is given to the people to ensure fairness and justice (Sykes, 2002). Application of fundamental principles of the law from a business perspective in Australia- examples Implementation of rule of law in Australia signifies that every person in the country, regardless of his economical, social, etc. status is subject to the same law and has equal opportunity in regards to judicial and legal process. The aspects of rule of law and democracy affect not only the citizens of the state but also business organizations. These fundamental principles promote equality and growth opportunities within the business and economic environment of the countries and thereby guarantee citizens the right to speak against the arbitrariness of government authorities (Australian Collaboration, 2014). If there is lack of democracy and rule of law within the legal and judicial process of State, then it has an adverse affect on not only business organizations but also individuals living in the State. The main aim of democratic society is to ensure equality of law to its citizens, which is done by integrating rule of law. Thus, without such a system rich and poor will be equally affected as they will not be considered equal. For example: in welfare state, rich is affected because the government focuses on advancement of poor or lower class people. Thus, the opportunities for the rich to grow expand and work on their business plans gets limited without the support of government. The fundamental principle of rule of law ensures that the law does not discriminate between rich or poor, educated or uneducated, employed or unemployed and thereby guarantees them equal protection under it. Conclusion The statement given by Allan Amanyire has been critically evaluated in the above research. From such analysis, it can be concluded that in a State where there is no implementation of rule of law or democracy, discrimination in regards to implementation and enforcement of law can be witnessed. Further, it cannot be ascertained that to whom such discrimination will affect and to whom it shall favor. However, it shall be negative and act as an impediment to grow for all the classes of society. Australia being a democratic federal state has implemented rule of law within its Constitution. Thus, it ensures that all organizations or stat up and individuals living in the State can seek protection under the law against arbitrary actions and equality before law. References A v. Hyden [(1984) 156 CLR 532] AM, T. H. K. L., 2012. The Rule of Law: its State of Health in Australia, Australia: Rule of Law. Australain Communist Party v. The Commonwealth (1951). Australian Collaboration, 2014. The Rule of Law, Australia: The Australian Collaboration. Blackshield, T. Williams, G., 1998. Australian Constitutional Law Theory. 2nd ed. s.l.:s.n. IDEA, 2015. Linkages between the rule of law, democracy and sustainable development. s.l., IDEA IDLO. Kinley, D., 1994. Constitutional Brokerage in Australia: Constitutions and the Doctrines of Parliamentery Supremacy and the Rule of Law. Federal Law Review, 22(1). Maravall, J. M. Przeworski, A., 2003. Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. MOADOPH, 2016. Rule of Law. [Online] Available at: https://explore.moadoph.gov.au/timelines/rule-of-law [Accessed 21 August 2016]. Raban, O., 2015. The Rationalization of Policy: on the relation between democracy anf the rule of law. NYUJLPP, 18(45), pp. 46-65. Sykes, A., 2002. The 'Rule of Law' as an Australian Constitutionalist Promiseq. AustLII, 9(1). Timothy Garton Ash, 2006. A Little Democracy is a Dangerous Thing- so Lets Have More of It. [Online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/aug/03/usa.syria; [Accessed 21 August 2016].

Bahuvrihi Compounds

Bahuvrihi Compounds Bahuvrihi Compounds Bahuvrihi Compounds By Mark Nichol Have you ever described someone as a blockhead? Have you explained an action as heavy-handed? Have you ever referred to someone as white-collar? If so, then you’ve employed a bahuvrihi compound. Such terms are compounds in which the first word of each pair is a feature of the second; the composition is an adjective (or, occasionally, a noun) attached to a noun to itself serve as an adjective or a noun. The name, from Sanskrit, is itself a bahuvrihi compound that means â€Å"much rice† but refers, as a form of synecdoche, to a rich man. (A synecdoche is a term that uses a part of something to refer to the whole, such as hand in the direction â€Å"Give me a hand† when what one is asking for is the use of one’s entire person.) Bahuvrihi compounds often refer to a characteristic of a person. They can be neutral (barefoot) or derogatory (lowlife). They can refer to a physical feature (graybeard or redhead) or to status within a profession or pursuit (blue-collar and white-collar, or tenderfoot) or an attitude associated with one’s place in society (bluestocking or highbrow). Compounds such as heavy-handed can describe an approach or a personality trait. They can also pertain to an object (houndstooth, to describe a fabric pattern; also styled hound’s-tooth) or to an animal (sabretooth); other compounds that, like these, consist of two nouns include several pejorative terms for someone perceived to be dumb or foolish: blockhead, bonehead, half-wit, and knucklehead. By contrast, a person considered highly intelligent is called an egghead. Note that bahuvrihi compounds are usually closed; the aforementioned blue-collar and white-collar, as well as half-wit and heavy-handed, are exceptions, as is the term â€Å"old money,† to refer to a family that has been wealthy for generations (or an individual from such a family). Whether the compound is open, hyphenated, or closed, is, as is the case with compounds in general, random; note blue-collar and bluestocking, for example. Bahuvrihi compounds are useful resources for writers as expressive ways to describe a person or, occasionally, a place or a thing. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:How to Punctuate References to Dates and TimesOn Behalf Of vs. In Behalf OfApostrophe with Plural Possessive Nouns

Dolphin Safe Tuna

Dolphin Safe Tuna Environmental and animal welfare groups promote dolphin-safe tuna, but the dolphin-safe label is in danger of being weakened in the U.S. and some animal protection groups do not support dolphin-safe tuna. Do Some Cans of Tuna Contain Dolphin Meat? No, cans of tuna do not contain dolphin meat. While dolphins are sometimes killed in tuna fishing (see below), the dolphins do not end up in the cans with the tuna. How are Dolphins Harmed in Tuna Fishing? Two types of tuna fishing are notorious for killing dolphins: Purse seine nets and driftnets. Purse seine nets: Dolphins and yellowfin tuna often swim together in large schools, and because dolphins are more visible and closer to the surface than tuna, the fishing boats will look for dolphins to find the tuna. The boats will then set a purse seine net in a circle around both species and capture dolphins along with the tuna. Purse seine nets are giant nets, typically 1,500 - 2,500 meters long and 150-250 meters deep, with a drawstring at the bottom and floats at the top. Some nets are equipped with fish aggregating devices that attract fish and help prevent the fish from escaping before the net can be closed. In addition to dolphins, the animals who are caught unintentionally - the incidental catch, can include sea turtles, sharks, and other fish. The crew is ususally able to release sea turtles back to the ocean unharmed, but the fish usually die. The problem with dolphins being killed in purse seine nets occurs mainly in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration estimates that between 1959 and 1976, over 6 million dolphins were killed in purse seine nets in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Driftnets: EarthTrust, an environmental NGO, calls driftnets the most destructive fishing technology ever devised by humankind. Driftnets are giant nylon nets that drift behind a boat. The nets have floats on top and may or may not have weights on the bottom, to keep the net hanging vertically in the water. Driftnets come in a variety of mesh sizes, depending on the target species, but they are a wall of death, killing everyone who gets caught in them. The United Nations banned driftnets over 2.5 kilometers long in 1991. Previously, driftnets up to 60 km long were in use and legal. According to EarthTrust, before the ban, driftnets killed over a hundred thousand dolphins and small cetaceans every year, along with millions of seabirds, tens of thousands of seals, thousands of sea turtles and great whales, and untold numbers of non-target fish. Pirate fisheries still use giant, illegal driftnets and will sometimes cut the nets loose to avoid getting caught, leaving these walls of death to continue drifting and killing indiscriminately for centuries to come. Although dolphin deaths from both methods has been greatly reduced, a 2005 study titled, Non-recovery of two spotted and spinner dolphin populations in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean found that dolphin populations have been slow to recover. Can Tuna be Caught Without Harming Dolphins? Yes, a purse seine net can be made to release dolphins. After encircling both the tuna and dolphins, the boat can conduct a backdown operation in which a portion of the net is lowered enough for dolphins to escape. While this technique does save dolphins, it does not address other incidental catch issues, such as sharks and sea turtles. Another way to catch fish without harming dolphins is long line fishing. Long line fishing uses a fishing line that is typically 250-700 meters long, with several branches and hundreds or thousands of baited hooks. While longline fishing does not kill dolphins, the incidental catch includes sharks, sea turtles and seabirds like albatross. The Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act In 1990, the U.S. Congress passed the Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act, 16 U.S.C. 1385, which charges the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) with regulating dolphin-safe tuna claims. The dolphin-safe claim means that the tuna were not caught with drift nets, and that â€Å"no tuna were caught on the trip in which such tuna were harvested using a purse seine net intentionally deployed on or to encircle dolphins, and that no dolphins were killed or seriously injured in the sets in which the tuna were caught.† Not all tuna sold in the U.S. is dolphin-safe. To summarize: If the tuna were caught without driftnets and without chasing, encircling or killing dolphins, it can be sold in the US and is dolphin-safe.If the tuna were caught by chasing and encircling dolphins, but no dolphins were killed or seriously injured (and other requirements are met), the tuna can be sold in the U.S. but cannot be called dolphin-safe.If the tuna was caught by chasing and encircling dolphins, and dolphins were killed, it cannot be sold in the U.S. Of course, the above is a simplification of the law, which also requires tuna canners to file monthly reports and requires large tuna purse seine vessels must carry an observer. NOAA also conducts spot-checks to verify dolphin-safe claims. For more details on the NOAAs tuna tracking and verification program, click here. You can also read the full text of the Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act here International Law International law also applies to the tuna/dolphin issue. In 1999, the United States signed the Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation Program (AIDCP). The other signatories include Belize, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, European Union, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, Vanuatu, and Venezuela. The AIDCP seeks to eliminate dolphin mortality in tuna fishing. Congress then amended the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) to effct the AIDCP in the United States. The AIDCP definition of dolphin-safe allows dolphins to be chased and encircled with nets, as long as dolphins are not killed or seriously injured. This definition differs from the U.S. definition, which does not permit the chasing or encircling of dolphins under the dolphin-safe label. According to the AIDCP, 93% of the sets made by chasing dolphins resulted in no deaths or serious injuries to dolphins. Challeges to the Dolphin-Safe Label Despite the dolphin-safe label being voluntary, and the fact that a fishery need not attain the dolphin-safe label in order to export tuna to the U.S., Mexico has twice challenged the U.S. dolphin-safe label as an unfair restriction on trade. In May of 2012, the World Trade Organization found that the current U.S. dolphin-safe label is inconsistent with the United States obligations under the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. In September, 2012, the U.S. and Mexico agreed that the U.S. would bring its dolphin-safe label in line with the WTOs recommendations and rulings by July of 2013.   To some, this is yet another example of how environmental and animal protection are sacrificed in the name of free trade. Todd Tucker, research director for Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch, states, â€Å"This latest ruling makes truth-in-labeling the latest casualty of so-called ‘trade’ pacts, which are more about pushing deregulation than actual trade . . . Members of Congress and the public will be very concerned that even voluntary standards can be deemed trade barriers.† Whats Wrong with Dolphin-Safe Tuna? The UK-based Ethical Consumer site calls the dolphin-safe label somewhat of a red herring for several reasons. First, the vast majority of canned tuna is skipjack tuna, not yellowfin tuna. Skipjack tuna do not swim with dolphins, so they are never caught using dolphins. Also, the site points out that, It has been estimated that saving one dolphin, by using (fish aggregating devices), costs 16,000 smaller or juvenile tuna, 380 mahimahi, 190 wahoo, 20 sharks and rays, 1200 triggerfish and other small fish, one marlin and ‘other’ animals. The very strong implication that dolphin-safe tuna is sustainable or more humane makes the label problematic. Some animal protection groups object to dolphin-safe tuna because of the impact on tuna. Tuna and other fish populations are threatened by overfishing and from an animal rights perspective, eating tuna hurts tuna. According to Sea Shepherd, bluefin tuna populations have fallen 85% since industrial fishing began, and current quotas are too high to be sustainable. Environmentalists and animal advocates were disappointed in 2010 when the parties to CITES refused to protect tuna. In September of 2012, conservation experts called for better protections for tuna. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature, five of the worlds eight tuna species are threatened or nearly threatened. Amanda Nickson, Director of Global Tuna Conservation at the Pew Environment Group stated, There is sufficient science available to set precautionary limits . . . If we wait five, 10 years for the science to be perfect, in the case of some species we may not have anything left to manage. Aside from concerns about extinction and overfishing, fish are sentient beings. From an animal rights perspective, fish have a right to be free of human use and exploitation. Even if there were no danger of overfishing, each individual fish has certain inherent rights, just as dolphins, seabirds and sea turtles do. Buying dolphin-safe tuna recognizes the dolphins rights, but fails to recognize the tunas rights, which is why many animal protection groups do not support dolphin-safe tuna.

Human Resource in Coffee Masters Company Assignment

Human Resource in Coffee Masters Company - Assignment Example Between this major entity and the minimal waged consumer, there are untapped resources in form of reaching out to these menial waged consumers (Edgar & Fiona 45). Coffee Masters have an objective of offering the quality coffee at a much lower price. Additionally, the organization has branches in suburbs which hold a significant number of people in its target market. Also in its objectives, the organization aims at using the human labor of the locals to fuel the activities in the organization. To aid in this the organization has a total of 100 employees in all its branches. Each branch has an internal staff, 30 members. The rest of the employees are involved other activities like marketing, sales, logistics, branch supervisors and the organization has a large transport system which has a significant number of employees depending on the size of the branch’s logistics activity (Turner, 76). The organization is controlled by a management team located at the main branch of the organization. Additionally, the organization has employed human resources representatives at each branch. The HR rationale in this organization involves minimal contact between the employees and the main management team. The management team greatly relies on the operations of branch supervisors as the human resource representatives. In this particular organizational setting, the human resource is a simple arrangement with three levels. The top level of human resource management in this setting is the top management team. The team is led by the founders of the enterprise who carry out the task of decision making and approving recommendations (Fielding 89). From the CEOs, the organization has branch managers as the second in command. The branch managers run the branches under strict instructions from the CEOs. Below the branch managers lie the other staff members with the highest ranked staff member being a branch supervisor. In  Ã‚  terms of human resource management, the organization has an HR manager who has the responsibility of hiring and terminating employment contracts.